Common Safety Method for Risk Assessment (CSM RA) is a framework developed by the European Union Agency for Railways to harmonise the safety assessment of railway systems across Europe. CSM RA provides a structured and transparent process for identifying, evaluating and mitigating risks associated with railway operations.

But can CSM RA be applied outside the rail industry? The answer is yes, as long as the principles and concepts of CSM RA are adapted to the specific context and characteristics of the other domain. In fact, CSM RA has been successfully applied to other sectors such as aviation, maritime, road and nuclear, demonstrating its versatility and robustness.

In this blog post, we will explore some of the benefits and challenges of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry, and provide some examples and best practices from different domains.

Benefits of applying CSM RA outside rail industry

One of the main benefits of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry is that it can facilitate cross-sectoral learning and collaboration. By using a common framework and terminology, different sectors can share their experiences and knowledge on risk assessment and learn from each other's best practices and lessons learned. This can foster innovation and improvement in safety performance across different domains.

Another benefit of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry is that it can enhance the consistency and quality of risk assessment. CSM RA provides a clear and comprehensive methodology for conducting risk assessment, covering all the phases from hazard identification to risk acceptance. By following this methodology, different sectors can ensure that their risk assessment is systematic, rigorous and traceable, and that they consider all the relevant aspects and stakeholders involved in their system.

Challenges of applying CSM RA outside rail industry

One of the main challenges of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry is that it requires a careful adaptation and customisation to the specific domain. CSM RA was originally designed for the rail industry, which has its own features and requirements in terms of safety regulation, system complexity, operational environment, and organizational culture. Therefore, applying CSM RA to other sectors may require some adjustments and modifications to make it suitable and applicable to their context.

Another challenge of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry is that it may encounter some resistance or skepticism from the stakeholders involved in the risk assessment process. Some stakeholders may perceive CSM RA as a bureaucratic or rigid framework that imposes unnecessary constraints or burdens on their activities. Others may prefer to use their own methods or tools that they are familiar with or trust more. Therefore, applying CSM RA to other sectors may require some communication and engagement strategies to convince and involve the stakeholders in the process.

Examples and best practices of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry.

Despite these challenges, there are many examples and best practices of applying CSM RA outside the rail industry. Here are some of them:

• Aviation: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has adopted CSM RA as a reference for its safety management system (SMS) framework, which applies to all aviation organisations in Europe. EASA has also developed a guidance document on how to use CSM RA for aviation risk assessment, covering topics such as hazard identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation and risk mitigation.

• Maritime: The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) has used CSM RA as a basis for its maritime risk assessment tool (MART), which supports the identification and assessment of risks related to maritime accidents, incidents and security threats. MART follows the same structure and logic as CSM RA, but adapts it to the maritime context and data sources.

• Road: The European Commission has funded a research project called SAFER-LC (Safer level crossing by integrating and optimising road-rail infrastructure management and design), which aims to improve safety at level crossings by applying CSM RA. The project has developed a web-based tool that guides users through the steps of CSM RA applied to level crossings, from hazard identification to risk acceptance.

• Nuclear: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has used CSM RA as an inspiration for its safety assessment methodology for nuclear power plants (SAMG), which provides a structured approach for assessing the safety implications of changes or modifications in nuclear power plants. SAMG follows a similar process as CSM RA, but incorporates specific criteria and techniques for nuclear safety analysis.

Conclusion

CSM RA is a versatile and robust framework for risk assessment that can be applied outside the rail industry with some adaptation and customisation. By applying CSM RA to other sectors, different domains can benefit from cross-sectoral learning and collaboration, as well as enhance the consistency and quality of their risk assessment. However, applying CSM RA to other sectors also poses some challenges that require careful consideration and communication with the stakeholders involved in the process.

Subscribe to our newsletters for more insights like this.